|
Post by Getsum47 (Raiders) on Jul 13, 2011 14:12:53 GMT -5
Atlanta should go Roddy White, he was only 5 receptions from tying the single season record of 143 White's Stats 138 Receptions 1,533 Yards 11.1YPC 9TDs White is in a contract year..... I think someone deserves like a 30 point contract after that year.
|
|
|
Post by cbb2010 on Jul 13, 2011 14:16:09 GMT -5
It was the oddest thing... A day or so ago, Roddy had a two year contract and the next thing you know, he has a one year contract. He must have a great agent. CBB2010 (Atlanta Falcons)
|
|
|
Post by Getsum47 (Raiders) on Jul 13, 2011 14:25:47 GMT -5
He just had that good of a year.
|
|
|
Post by tommybomb789 on Jul 13, 2011 14:43:25 GMT -5
Can't decide Between Rodgers with a 108 QB rating to lead all other QB or WR Nelson who had a 1000 season for the pack. Matthews as always had another good year
|
|
|
Post by gramazins on Jul 13, 2011 15:28:42 GMT -5
Can't decide Between Rodgers with a 108 QB rating to lead all other QB or WR Nelson who had a 1000 season for the pack. Matthews as always had another good year Suck a dick
|
|
|
Post by lions11 on Jul 13, 2011 15:37:35 GMT -5
92 tackles, 2 picks, 5 sacks for Matthews?
That isnt anything special.
|
|
|
Post by Getsum47 (Raiders) on Jul 13, 2011 15:47:42 GMT -5
Yeah you gotta go with Rodgers. He almost completed 80% of his passes and had a 4 to 1 td to INT ratio.
Nelson had a good season and you could give it to him because of the unexpected quality of his play vs expecting it from Rodgers, but I would say Nelson wouldn;t have had nearly as good a season if Rodgers wasn;t there, vs if Nelson wasn;t there Rodgers would have still torn it up.
|
|
|
Post by tommybomb789 on Jul 13, 2011 16:25:46 GMT -5
Yeah you gotta go with Rodgers. He almost completed 80% of his passes and had a 4 to 1 td to INT ratio. Nelson had a good season and you could give it to him because of the unexpected quality of his play vs expecting it from Rodgers, but I would say Nelson wouldn;t have had nearly as good a season if Rodgers wasn;t there, vs if Nelson wasn;t there Rodgers would have still torn it up. Yeah its rodgers hands down, Nelson was my #1 WR as the CPU played it so those numbers would be expected with rodgers as the QB and Clay had a good year, not a great one
|
|
|
Post by lions11 on Jul 14, 2011 11:32:55 GMT -5
I found one.
Carl Nicks - 24 Pancakes and 0 sacks allowed - was our best performer. Of the few lineman who managed to not allow a sack, he had the second most pancakes.
|
|
|
Post by tommybomb789 on Jul 14, 2011 11:54:02 GMT -5
I found one. Carl Nicks - 24 Pancakes and 0 sacks allowed - was our best performer. Of the few lineman who managed to not allow a sack, he had the second most pancakes. In the league?
|
|
|
Post by Getsum47 (Raiders) on Jul 14, 2011 12:09:05 GMT -5
I found one. Carl Nicks - 24 Pancakes and 0 sacks allowed - was our best performer. Of the few lineman who managed to not allow a sack, he had the second most pancakes. In the league? On the team. His 24 would have been 3rd on my team alone. Bulaga pulled in 39 Pancakes... However he gave up a ton of sacks. Raiders best Olineman was Campbell 21 Pancakes to 1 sack
|
|
|
Post by lions11 on Jul 14, 2011 12:11:58 GMT -5
I found one. Carl Nicks - 24 Pancakes and 0 sacks allowed - was our best performer. Of the few lineman who managed to not allow a sack, he had the second most pancakes. In the league? Of all the lineman in the league that did not allow a sack,Nicks had the second most pancakes.
|
|
|
Post by Getsum47 (Raiders) on Jul 14, 2011 12:13:23 GMT -5
Gotchya... that makes sense.
|
|
|
Post by Getsum47 (Raiders) on Jul 14, 2011 12:14:15 GMT -5
Can;t imagine that was a very long list of lineman that didn;t allow a sack.
|
|
|
Post by lions11 on Jul 14, 2011 12:16:19 GMT -5
Id say about 10 maybe?
I had 2 of them.
|
|